“Current” review of the “plot” continuation of Far Cry 5 in the “post-apocalypse”.
Far Cry: New Dawn
Best comments
Phrases from the beginning: “This is not funny! Stop it! Good already! Don’t do that again!"- this is both a review of the game and my message to Ubisoft.
Primal was at least some kind of experiment; it’s not every day that games come out in a similar setting. And here we see another unsuccessful attempt at the post-apocalypse, of which there are more than enough now.
As an example – the same purple bears that come across your way at the beginning of the game, when you only have a level 1 gun in your hands.
Do you really like putting six clips in them?? If without guile.
So this nonsense wouldn’t be in the game if it weren’t for the donation that allows you to buy a legendary for rubles. (He wasn’t in Far Cry 5.)
To sell something, you need to create a demand for it. No demand – no sales.
Unfortunately, demand is increased by such low methods. So you don’t have to donate if you don’t want to. But still, the very presence of microtransactions in the game changes its gameplay. Do you use them or not?.
At least in the subject everything is exactly like that.
I like farcrays, but I didn’t https://non-uk-casinos.co.uk/review/winit-casino/ like this one.
Still individual 🙂
Of course, I understand that explaining something to you is like throwing peas at the wall, but I said right in the review that the final bosses passed, and he did it with the help of a knocked-out elite bow.
But I forgot that an overly large brain puts pressure on the ears and makes it difficult to hear what the reviewer is saying. The main thing is that he started the video by beating the character and making funny jokes.
“And he obviously didn’t beat the game, no. Because I decided so, and I’m always right.»
You have a big heart, you can’t take that away. To declare with such confidence that the editors personally downvote you.
Don’t call Denis to do reviews anymore. He harshly criticized the game, but I still wanted to play.
Someone here doesn’t hear what we’re talking about. You say “I don’t feel like leveling up and coming back” and because of this you will play, say, 5 hours more, and the day is about the fact that these 5 hours of routine did not exist without microtransactions.
I would give trash. Both this game and Crackdown 3. Because in the form in which they came out, they shouldn’t exist at all. Everything seems to be said correctly in the text, but not everyone listens and understands. Only a “Garbage” tag in the AAA category of projects can revive people and force them to actively discuss what happened. It would create at least a little movement in the comments… and I would be even more interested in reading them than playing one of these Vyserov projects.
A game castrated in all aspects. There is no plot, the missions are of the same type, there is a lot of grinding, and the player’s arsenal is very limited: a bow and a couple of clubs and spears. Plus, fighting in the game is absolutely not interesting. Because Yubi lazy asses did not improve the mechanics of melee combat, so all melee combat is a dull click on the enemy until he dies.
You see, “commentators” must have at least the slightest “sense of taste”. The video review shows that for the first time in the series, a person made all the sides. Despite his statements, in these same comments, despite the fact that he loves the series. You were fed a series with a softboot in the 5th part, not approaching it as completely as with the reboot of Assassins in Origin, you happily gobbled it up. Yubiki thought; why the hell are they eating, let’s castrate the card, reskin it, sell it as a standalon? And the Sievers are like: COME ON, FEED US MORE GUAN.
Primal was interesting. Even though not all the potential of the setting was revealed, it was just interesting to dive into it at least. Here the fifth part is only worse in everything.
Yes everything is fine. The shooting is good, there are a lot of guns, the world is cool, the enemies are varied, you can also build. Nice fan retexture of Far Cry 5. I don’t know why they found fault with it, as if it was a full-fledged game that is sold on steam for HOW MUCH.
I strongly disagree with the assessment. The game deserves "Trash" without any concessions to the fact that it’s Far Cry.
It was okay even earlier to make such concessions simply for bad decisions. Ten years ago, such flirtations with role-playing elements would have been called a failed experiment.
Now, when you have the opportunity to buy some things for real currency… Well, I would call it something between theft and fraud. Previously, the purchase of such “boosts” and pay-to-win mechanics were common in online games and, over time, more or less disappeared due to the fact that this is really somehow not always fair. But now the developers are pushing it into purely offline games, and this already causes a moral dilemma: for such purchases, it seems, no one is bothering anyone, but if you don’t pour money into the game, then the game will prevent you from enjoying it. Moreover, “interfering with enjoyment” are the most correct words, since even with an adequate playing style, you get such inadequate situations as were shown in the review. So, I think that even Far Cry cannot be forgiven for this.
ps. The cooperative doesn’t count, if anything.
Since you speak in analogies, then keep the analogy.
Let’s pretend the games are girls. Any short games with high replay value are sex for friendship. Online games are ladies aiming for marriage. Far Cry: New Dawn is a girl from the Internet. She swore that she was aiming for a serious relationship, but in the end she ran away after the first night. And this was preceded by a date where she behaved funny, but completely inappropriately. So whose fault is it that she is not nearly as good as she said, and even with a foolishness??
The age difference probably has an effect here, can you imagine, I’m not trying to kill everything that moves towards me?.
In a shooter. In which there is really nothing except killing enemies. Clear.
And here a simple and logical question comes into play: if the setting itself does not imply interesting gameplay, then why make a game in this setting at all?? Show "look, we can"? And they really can. What’s the point??